Speech Act Theory and a new revolution in linguistics are opening unexplored ground in how we understand human language. Some younger  biblical scholars like Dr. Lace Williams-Tinajero, are already stating to use these insights and they are coming to grips with what it means for theology. For centuries, the central question of biblical interpretation or any literary interpretation has been what do the words mean. Any statement or writing came under the microscope of what does it mean and is it true. Scholars, believers, and skeptics based their interpretations on what did the writers meant by their words. They argued endlessly like boys at the playground about whose interpretation was bigger and better. It would grind dialog to halt into the nan, nan, na nan na chant of right and wrong. We are at the cusp of a new revolution of understanding with Speech Act Theory and the other linguistics methodologies shedding new light on human language. The implications of this new revolution will cause an earthquake of understanding of interpretation for years to come.

Speech Act Theory has its foundation in a series of lectures by J L Austin at the William James lecture series given at Harvard in 1955, which later was gathered in a book, How to Do Things Words. His central question was what do speaker do with language. By switching the question of language from meaning to action, he was able to open a new ways of seeing the spoken and the written words. That a speaker and writer have an intention when they use words, may seem self evident, but like any new powerful insight, it has the power to shake the foundation of Biblical Interpretation for years to come. For biblical understanding, we can see the power by asking what the writer was doing with his words rather than what his words mean. Take the beginning of the Gospel of John; the hymn that begins the Gospel is what Speech Act Theory calls an expressive. The writer sets the tone by expressing his beliefs about the nature of the world. John wanted to express how he saw the world and not create something new. Contrast that with the United States Constitution, which is what Speech Act Theory calls a declarative. The framers of the constitution wanted to create a new entity, the United States Government. The difference becomes apparent in that the Gospel writer was not out to create or help create a new religion, but express how the world how changed for him. The framers knew they were creating something new and wanted to shape it.

Read the rest of this entry »

Related posts

• 5 Reasons To Pursue Cheap Higher Education In Europe
• The Importance of Books and Reading in Early Learning
• Neuro Linguistic Programming – The Road to Success
• The Era of Online Education
• Elementary School Career Education – The Need, Basics, Examples, and Guidelines